The definitive statement without evidence is the hallmark of our current informational wasteland — so I am careful about the words I use. Having said that, I can’t overstate the importance of what was posted on Twitter by Andrew Torba, the CEO of Gab, a social media company which law enforcement claims was hosting an account owned by the Butler shooter.
As I predicted in my report from the cottage, DC’s bad actors would eventually focus on social media accounts to deflect blame away from Democrats’ incendiary rhetoric which I believe was very much at play — even if Crooks didn’t act alone. I suspected they would lay the groundwork for Crooks to be portrayed as a right-wing, Trump supporter and that is exactly what the FBI has attempted. But Torba, courageously is saying not so fast. Here is what he wrote:
BREAKING: The FBI is now claiming that the Trump shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks had an unspecified "social media account" in 2019/2020 (when he was 14/15 years old) that posted "anti-immigrant and anti-semitic" content.
This is not consistent with Gab's understanding of the shooter's motives based on an Emergency Disclosure Request ("EDR") we received from the FBI last week for the Gab account "EpicMicrowave" which, based on the content of that EDR, the FBI appeared to think belonged to Thomas Crooks.
Many, particularly regime media reporters, have doubted Gab's claims that this request existed. Normally we don't confirm the existence or content of law enforcement communications. In this instance we had to make an exception due to the overwhelming public interest in disclosure and transparency.
As a courtesy to law enforcement, we are not going to post the entire request. This is the first page of that request. The story is this: the account for which data was requested was, UNEQUIVOCALLY, pro-Biden and in particular pro-Biden's immigration policy. To the best of Gab's knowledge, as of 2021, Crooks was a pro-lockdown, pro-immigration, left-wing Joe Biden supporter.
Here is a portion of the FBI request to Gab:
Here is acting FBI Director Paul Abbate spinning whoppers under oath that sneakily attempt to change the politics of Lee Harvey Crooks.
Here is a screenshot of the posts from that account:
This is actual bravery from someone in the tech industry and Torba should be applauded. I guarantee you he will eventually pay a price.
Meanwhile - assassination denialism has kicked in. SM posts, regime media commentators and lefty Youtubers are beginning to posit that Trump was NOT the victim of an assassination attempt. They don’t seem to know exactly what happened but in our world of propaganda, raising doubts is enough to calm the nerves of frightened democrats and allow them to slip back into their comfortable torpor of feel good lies and political twerking.
The post below is one of hundreds casting doubt on what we witnessed with our own eyes.
Call me a cynic but I suspect that if there was any evidence Trump staged an event in which two people died, he would be in shackles and gleefully perp-walked for the cameras by the FBI.
Stay critical.
#truthovertribe
How quickly the attempted assassination of a former president leaves the spotlight. Just as fast as the body of Thomas Crooks was cremated without CSI and others involved in the criminal murder and attempted murder investigation being at the autopsy and FBI literally cleaned up the evidence.
Many important questions from listening to videos eye witnesses and sound experts. Allowing law enforcement to leave 2 hours later without confiscation of their weapons for analysis is disturbing. One of the murder weapons could have walked out with a cop as seen in video. We're ballistic tests done on all weapons and were police snipers checked for any signs they shot a gun? Apparently law enforcement in this area are known to work with organized crime. Not very trustworthy it appears.
An eye witness states they saw 8 muzzle flashes yet a AR 15 with a muzzle hider would hide the flash in the daylight and someone says it was on Crooks gun shown on the roof and secret service snipers would easily have spotted Crooks location and so would people in the stands if the muzzle flash was visible. Also listen to the first 4 law enforcement on the roof first who found only 5 shell casing or cartridge not 8. This is consistent with Crooks shooting the 4 to 8 shots and the first 3 coming from a vent or second floor window. . The sound tests show this and the eye witness video sounds indicate this and the vent seems very plausible. Someone says the first 3 shots sound like a chain link fence sound in the background. How come an irate man was pushing people away from in front of the building with the windows and the vent and where Crooks on top shot from. Secret Service seen making people standing move from behind Trump on the podium just before shots fired? Everyone focuses on the windows but the vent just under Crooks location would be perfect. It lines up with the shots at Trump and hitting 2 innocent bystanders. Did the shooter of the first 3 shots get cut on the vent and was bleeding in the
washroom as per police on the radio regarding a second shooter and blood Did K 9 dogs find the blood trail to a white van with Arizona license plates registered to Robert Yearick. Maxwell Yearick who is Antifa and the son of Roger Yearick is on the terrorist watch list. His family called in a missing persons report a couple days later. That would be interesting as then they knew where their terrorist son was therefore harboring a terrorist on the terrorist watch list would be a criminal charge. Yearick Armory does explosives from Arizona. The fact the white van supposedly had explosives and Crooks Hyundai had explosives is odd as it's kind of difficult for Crooks to drive the van and car to the site by himself. He was rather busy that day according to law enforcement and others. . These lies add up. 15 police would have videotaped the white van with Arizona license plate and mainstream media had the tip of Maxwell Yearick These 15 police would no doubt check out the license plate for the owner wouldn't they?
NO one asks the right questions other than amazing people in comments and independent journalists. Even the politician representatives do not focus on all the events. Why not? Senator Ron Johnson confirms the pings of Thomas Crooks phone to Clairaton Shooting Range where he visited it 38x in nearly a year . They had his picture on their phone chats. DHS trains there and that Greg Nichol supposedly was training there. These people need subpoena to answer under oath. Appears FBI is covering up. Do you trust law enforcement who state cops in this area are in bed with organized crime?
Who do you think attempted to assassinate Trump. Well lets see. Over the police radio which would be picked up by the security cameras in the lights it was stated second shooter had left blood in the washroom. Hey wait everyone. That destroys the lone gunman theory but they stick to it still . All 8 shots came from Crooks. Promise. We told you that so believe it. The shooter bleeding went into the bathroom of the building filled with snipers and police? Anyone want to ask the police snipers if they were shooting from a window in the building at Trump where blood of Maxwell Yearick an antifa snipers blood was found. The white van was registered to a Roger Yearick the father of Maxwell Yearick who is deceased and it had Arizona license plates where the 20 year okd Thomas Crooks was seen going back and forth to during the day and news reported Thomas Crooks owned the white van but they are misleading as the Butler county ran the plates and it was Yearick the owner not Crooks and with the blood found that was Maxwell Yearick then you know Yearick was the owner of the explosives which no doubt came from Yearick Armory in Arizona.
Very simple question to ask tons of police and snipers there. Would a would be assassin go into a washroom in a building with snipers and police. I think we know the answer. Chris Martensen on twitter is doing a superb job with investigating and the video of the shooting and police actions by a Dave Stewart brings lots of questions. This guy Dave and his video has the shooting heard clearly and police were running away from the side where Thomas Crooks was seen and people were yelling he has a gun before the shooting. Strange behavior. Unless Thomas Crooks was a patsy and was a spotter for the real shooter Maxwell Yearick and how come a counter sniper changed his clothes. The same sniper who saw Thomas Crooks at the picnic table at 435 but there was no drone or scope or gun with him at the time? The same sniper who conveniently sent texts saying he spotted a strange guy at the picnic table but he was leaving yet he was the guy in charge as other police stated and he is seen in a window but he supposedly left and came out 5 minutes after the shooting .FBI director is willing to speak freely on Crooks using a drone around 4 pm or so but Crooks is seen at the picnic table and very suspicious but no drone with him. Is it possible this sniper was actually a shooter at Trump from a window or aided the shooter Maxwell Yearick who was bleeding so this counter sniper got blood on his clothes and changed. The texts are just an elaborate scheme to divert attention. How come Maxwell Yearick was bleeding? Was he on the roof and got cut escaping or was he hit by a bullet which they say a cop shot at Crooks but it was really Yearick. All common sense questions. This sniper has lots of explaining including 2 snipers in the building second floor who left their command post and guns with the most ridicuulous lame excuse you could imagine. Too much incompetence to be incompetence? It appears they were guarding the building not Trump. Why? Because the shooters were being protected? Interesting observations.
When you see lying and perjury by people who are supposed to be law enforcement it raises red flags and Chris Martensen when analyzing the shots states the first 3 came from in a building and there were open windows seen in photos at the time of the shooting with line of sight to Trump. There is a photo of a flash in a window but that needs verifying as to authenticity. The Dave Stewart video is credible and he is seen filming by another person filming. His phone was confiscated for 6 days by the police. I think the FBI had it. He was handcuffed by one law enforcement. What a joke. No excuses for that.
In fact Dave Stewart has shots of a drone flying while the shooting is happening. The secret service said they did not use a drone . Kimberley Cheatle the disgraced secret service supported by disgraced lying FBI wanted to destroy evidence of the cocaine found in the White House last summer. Secret service has revealed this. I think honest Secret Service are putting 2 and 2 together as to who was behind this assassination attempt.
Christopher Wray in testimony lied regarding Crooks and a scope. On the roof top 12 minutes after Crooks was killed they discuss does he have a scope and they say its in his pocket. Where were the brain matter of Crooks. They did shoot at his head wuth a sniper rifle. . How come they were hosing down the roof so quickly? It was a crime scene and a high profile one at that. Many questions because of weird behavior by supposed honest law enforcement trying to find the truth especially when its stated there was a second shooter and his blood was found in a bathroom. Why the cover up.
Why are there redacted documents since Crooks is dead. Strange behavior by those who are caught lying and perjurying themselves and caught trying to destroy cocaine evidence in the White House which is a criminal offence.?
They are insulting Americans with their criminal behavior and possible assassination plot against Trump.
REMEMBER security cameras at the American Glass buildings will be in lights and hidden everywhere as this company does bullet proof glass for the Dept of Defence so those cameras will film everyuthing inside and out and not be seen by the average person and it will have picked up the police talk outside and on the radio regarding the blood found in a bathroom indicating a second shooter but covered up. Why is it covered up. Maxwell Yearick is on a terror watchlist as an Antifa sniper but word is he went to Ukraine to fight with the Ukrainian army and works for the CIA. But he is on a terror watch list. How can that be? Anyone seeing naughty stuff being done. They can take control of a phone and do searches you did not do remotely. They can hide it from your view. So when they say we opened a phone and found this dont automaticallly believe those caught perjurying themselves or dont recall or dont know at the moment when its their job to know. Narratives are easy by those with access to lots of money,