Discussion about this post

User's avatar
james's avatar

I know this is not maybe on topic with your latest piece but I just listened to an interview hosted by Matt Galloway of CBC radio about the recent decision by Judge Mosley rebuking the government about the emergencies act.

https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-63-the-current/clip/16037439-judge-rules-invoking-emergencies-act-unreasonable-expectations-placed

Not surprisingly it was nauseating listening to the framing of this interview. The law professor being interviewed essentially implied that the government should be looking at changing the wording in the emergencies act to include economic disruptions, etc There was no mention whatsoever of the fact that the Coutts blockade and the Windsor blockade were already long resolved before the emergency act was invoked. Meanwhile the Covid mandates had shut down businesses for months causing massive economic damage yet somehow a few businesses in Ottawa who voluntarily shut down is a national economic disruption. The host brought up the arms cache in Coutts to show how dangerous this all was and they talked about psychological harm and the usual nonsense. So the reality of the Coutts story and the diagolon bs is completely lost on these supposed journalists.

Then Rosemary Barton came on and it was so obvious she was trying to downplay this and inferred that the Liberals were meeting in Montreal trying so hard to focus on important issues for Canadians like housing etc ad this ruling was a nuisance that reawakened an issue that everyone thought was dead. Both Matt and Rosemary laughed about this being like a zombie rising from the dead as if it was clear that everyone knows that the convoy was deemed bad and that we should all move on. Then they accused Poilievre of using this to fuel his narrative. They don’t even try to be unbiased about which political party they support. It was such condescending arrogant and out of touch elitist talk. It was just another example of how out of touch theses journalists are with real Canadians who actually in large numbers were rejoicing about this decision and who are quite sympathetic to the convoy.

Meanwhile this other guy on cbc Jason Markusoff literally spends his journalistic career smearing Danielle Smith. Literally every article this guy does is to try and make her look bad and of course you are not allowed to leave comments on his articles. I never see similar articles like this about Justin Trudeau no matter what scandal he is involved in. His latest smearing is for her meeting with that evil Tucker Carlson and discussing crazy theories about those very dangerous Coutts 4 men. If this guy was a real journalist he might take an hour or so to actually look into whats going on with the Coutts 4 and realize that there is obviously something rotten with the handling of their case.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/tucker-carlson-danielle-smith-calgary-analysis-1.7094117

Anyway I am sure you all know and are not surprised by this but it really gets my goat as to how biased and unethical the reporting is from the CBC. Unfortunately too many Canadians buy into this left wing wokist state propoganda. It would be interestijg for someone like you, Trish or Rodney Palmer or any other awake journalist to highlight a few of these bs pieces and pick them apart on a weekly basis and try to get as many Canadians as possible to see the lies they are being fed.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

I agree, Trish. CJ's speech was EPIC and should go down in the history books as one of the greatest speeches on totalitarianism … if only the history books weren't being written by the totalitarians. Delighted to hear you will be speaking with him, and I look forward to listening.

Expand full comment
40 more comments...

No posts