We have a big show tomorrow with CJ Hopkins who was acquitted of thought crimes this week on the very same day Justice Mosley ruled that Trudeau’s invocation of the Emergencies Act was illegal. A great day for freedom lovers — freedom to protest and to speak. CJ is exhausted and taking a break but has graciously accepted an invitation to appear on the podcast this week. He is a loyal friend.
To update yourselves, below is a portion of Matt Taibbi’s characterization of the case written before this week’s acquittal verdict.
Just when you may have thought things couldn’t get any crazier: American playwright and humorist C.J. Hopkins, profiled in this space on numerous occasions, has been sent a “punishment order” by a German judge, offering him a Sophie’s Choice of 60 days in jail or 3,600 euros.
His crime? Essentially, insulting the German health minister in a tweet, and using a scarcely-visible image of a Swastika on a mask in a book critical of the global pandemic response, The Rise of the New Normal Reich. He was first accused of this “crime” in June, shortly after Roger Waters was placed under investigation for wearing his clearly satirical “Pink” costume in a stage performance in Berlin. As I wrote when C.J. was charged weeks later, authorities claim that through the use of the mask image, C.J. was “disseminating propaganda, the contents of which are intended to further the aims of a former National Socialist organization.”
The judge in C.J.’s case has already heard free-speech argumentation from his lawyer, and this technically being a non-jury misdemeanor offense, has already ruled against those arguments. C.J. will apparently have a chance to argue for mitigation, but the decree has already been handed down.
Below are Hopkins’ words for the court delivered this week. It is a speech for the ages and it is posted on his Substack — one you should be reading. CJ has lead the way for years by reporting and analyzing through satire, humour and deep research the toxic New Normal — before it was on most people’s radar.
Berlin District Court, January 23, 2024
My name is CJ Hopkins. I am an American playwright, author, and political satirist. My plays have been produced and received critical acclaim internationally. My political satire and commentary is read by hundreds of thousands of people all over the world. 20 years ago, I left my own country because of the fascistic atmosphere that had taken hold of the USA at that time, the time of the US invasion of Iraq, a war of aggression based on my government's lies. I emigrated to Germany and made a new life here in Berlin, because I believed that Germany, given its history, would be the last place on earth to ever have anything to do with any form of totalitarianism again.
The gods have a strange sense of humor. This past week, thousands of people have been out in the streets all over Germany protesting against fascism, chanting "never again is now." Many of these people spent the past three years, 2020 to 2023, unquestioningly obeying orders, parroting official propaganda, and demonizing anyone who dared to question the government's unconstitutional and authoritarian actions during the so-called Covid pandemic. Many of these same people, those who support Palestinian rights, are now shocked that the new form of totalitarianism they helped usher into existence is being turned against them.
And here I am, in criminal court in Berlin, accused of disseminating pro-Nazi propaganda in two Tweets about mask mandates. The German authorities have had my speech censored on the Internet, and have damaged my reputation and income as an author. One of my books has been banned by Amazon in Germany. All this because I criticized the German authorities, because I mocked one of their decrees, because I pointed out one of their lies.
This turn of events would be absurdly comical if it were not so infuriating. I cannot adequately express how insulting it is to be forced to sit here and affirm my opposition to fascism. For over thirty years, I have written and spoken out against fascism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism etc. Anyone can do an Internet search, find my books, read the reviews of my plays, read my essays, and discover who I am and what my political views are in two or three minutes. And yet I am accused by the German authorities of disseminating pro-Nazi propaganda. I am accused of doing this because I posted two Tweets challenging the official Covid narrative and comparing the new, nascent form of totalitarianism that it has brought into being -- i.e., the so-called "New Normal" -- to Nazi Germany.
Let me be very clear. In those two Tweets, and in my essays throughout 2020 to 2022, and in my current essays, I have indeed compared the rise of this new form of totalitarianism to the rise of the best-known 20th-Century form of totalitarianism, i.e., Nazi Germany. I have made this comparison, and analyzed the similarities and differences between these two forms of totalitarianism, over and over again. And I will continue to do so. I will continue to analyze and attempt to explain this new, emerging form of totalitarianism, and to oppose it, and warn my readers about it.
The two Tweets at issue here feature a swastika covered by one of the medical masks that everyone was forced to wear in public during 2020 to 2022. That is the cover art of my book. The message conveyed by this artwork is clear. In Nazi Germany, the swastika was the symbol of conformity to the official ideology. During 2020 to 2022, the masks functioned as the symbol of conformity to a new official ideology. That was their purpose. Their purpose was to enforce people's compliance with government decrees and conformity to the official Covid-pandemic narrative, most of which has now been proven to have been propaganda and lies.
Mask mandates do not work against airborne viruses. This had been understood and acknowledged by medical experts for decades prior to the Spring of 2020. It has now been proven to everyone and acknowledged by medical experts again. The science of mask mandates did not suddenly change in March of 2020. The official narrative changed. The official ideology changed. The official "reality" changed. Karl Lauterbach was absolutely correct when he said, "The masks always send out a signal." They signal they sent out from 2020 to 2022 was, "I conform. I do not ask questions. I obey orders."
That is not how democratic societies function. That is how totalitarian systems function.
Not every form of totalitarianism is the same, but they share common hallmarks. Forcing people to display symbols of conformity to official ideology is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Declaring a "state of emergency" and revoking constitutional rights for no justifiable reason is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Banning protests against government decrees is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Inundating the public with lies and propaganda designed to terrify people into mindless obedience is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Segregating societies is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Censoring dissent is a hallmark of totalitarianism. Stripping people of their jobs because they refuse to conform to official ideology is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Fomenting mass hatred of a "scapegoat" class of people is a hallmark of totalitarianism. Demonizing critics of the official ideology is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Instrumentalizing the law to punish dissidents and make examples of critics of the authorities is a hallmark of totalitarianism.
I have documented the emergence of all of these hallmarks of totalitarianism in societies throughout the West — including but not limited to Germany — since March of 2020. I will continue to do so. I will continue to warn readers about this new, emerging form of totalitarianism and attempt to understand it, and oppose it. I will compare this new form of totalitarianism to earlier forms of totalitarianism, and specifically to Nazi Germany, whenever it is appropriate and contributes to our understanding of current events. That is my job as a political satirist and commentator, and as an author, and my responsibility as a human being.
The German authorities can punish me for doing that. You have the power to do that. You can make an example of me. You can fine me. You can imprison me. You can ban my books. You can censor my content on the Internet, which you have done. You can defame me, and damage my income and reputation as an author, as you have done. You can demonize me as a "conspiracy theorist," as an "anti-vaxxer," a "Covid denier," an "idiot," and an "extremist," which you have done. You can haul me into criminal court and make me sit here, in Germany, in front of my wife, who is Jewish, and deny that I am an anti-Semite who wants to relativize the Holocaust. You have the power to do all these things.
However, I hope that you will at least have the integrity to call this what it is, and not hide behind false accusations that I am somehow supporting the Nazis by comparing the rise of a new form of totalitarianism to the rise of an earlier totalitarian system, one that took hold of and ultimately destroyed this country in the 20th Century, and murdered millions in the process, because too few Germans had the courage to stand up and oppose it when it first began. I hope that you will at least have the integrity to not pretend that you actually believe I am disseminating pro-Nazi propaganda, when you know very well that is not what I am doing.
Read the rest of it here on CJ’s Substack.
If you have any questions for CJ — post them below and I will try and put them to him tomorrow morning.
Stay critical.
I know this is not maybe on topic with your latest piece but I just listened to an interview hosted by Matt Galloway of CBC radio about the recent decision by Judge Mosley rebuking the government about the emergencies act.
https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-63-the-current/clip/16037439-judge-rules-invoking-emergencies-act-unreasonable-expectations-placed
Not surprisingly it was nauseating listening to the framing of this interview. The law professor being interviewed essentially implied that the government should be looking at changing the wording in the emergencies act to include economic disruptions, etc There was no mention whatsoever of the fact that the Coutts blockade and the Windsor blockade were already long resolved before the emergency act was invoked. Meanwhile the Covid mandates had shut down businesses for months causing massive economic damage yet somehow a few businesses in Ottawa who voluntarily shut down is a national economic disruption. The host brought up the arms cache in Coutts to show how dangerous this all was and they talked about psychological harm and the usual nonsense. So the reality of the Coutts story and the diagolon bs is completely lost on these supposed journalists.
Then Rosemary Barton came on and it was so obvious she was trying to downplay this and inferred that the Liberals were meeting in Montreal trying so hard to focus on important issues for Canadians like housing etc ad this ruling was a nuisance that reawakened an issue that everyone thought was dead. Both Matt and Rosemary laughed about this being like a zombie rising from the dead as if it was clear that everyone knows that the convoy was deemed bad and that we should all move on. Then they accused Poilievre of using this to fuel his narrative. They don’t even try to be unbiased about which political party they support. It was such condescending arrogant and out of touch elitist talk. It was just another example of how out of touch theses journalists are with real Canadians who actually in large numbers were rejoicing about this decision and who are quite sympathetic to the convoy.
Meanwhile this other guy on cbc Jason Markusoff literally spends his journalistic career smearing Danielle Smith. Literally every article this guy does is to try and make her look bad and of course you are not allowed to leave comments on his articles. I never see similar articles like this about Justin Trudeau no matter what scandal he is involved in. His latest smearing is for her meeting with that evil Tucker Carlson and discussing crazy theories about those very dangerous Coutts 4 men. If this guy was a real journalist he might take an hour or so to actually look into whats going on with the Coutts 4 and realize that there is obviously something rotten with the handling of their case.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/tucker-carlson-danielle-smith-calgary-analysis-1.7094117
Anyway I am sure you all know and are not surprised by this but it really gets my goat as to how biased and unethical the reporting is from the CBC. Unfortunately too many Canadians buy into this left wing wokist state propoganda. It would be interestijg for someone like you, Trish or Rodney Palmer or any other awake journalist to highlight a few of these bs pieces and pick them apart on a weekly basis and try to get as many Canadians as possible to see the lies they are being fed.
I agree, Trish. CJ's speech was EPIC and should go down in the history books as one of the greatest speeches on totalitarianism … if only the history books weren't being written by the totalitarians. Delighted to hear you will be speaking with him, and I look forward to listening.