38 Comments

It would seem that Crown Attorneys prosecuting people involved in the Freedom Convoy have a penchant for late disclosure of evidence to the defence. The very same thing happened at the outset of the trial of the Coutts Four in Lethbridge. The Crown there dropped some 3000 pages of new disclosure on the defence just days before the trial was to commence. This caused defence lawyers to seek an adjournment from the judge in order to pour over this new information. Because, this new material might have a huge impact on their defence strategy. Now the defence was granted the adjournment, but I didn't hear whether the judge rebuked the Crown in the way Judge Perkins-McVey did at the Lich-Barber trial. The Coutts Crown, however, may have scuppered themselves, because it would appear that in that disclosure they provided the defence with materials that they meant to redact. The defence, upon seeing this unredacted information accused the Crown of having given false and misleading instructions leading up to the arrest of th Coutts Four. They made an application to have that information made public. The judge's decision was to 'unseal' the material, but it is still pending on if and when it will be made public. Now the late disclosure on the part of the Crown in Ottawa, may lengthen the trial, but at least Tamara and Chris are out on bail, while the Coutts Four are just coming up to spending almost two years behind bars--and yet have not been found guilty of anything.

Expand full comment

He also enjoys all the benefits of the Dominion voting system! nobody likes him but he still gets voted in???

Expand full comment

Trish,

The latest podcast episode was SO good. I’m in the giant line of people who have deep gratitude for your work. You have, figuratively, walked beside so many of us though this treachery.

Thank you also for attending the trail and keeping us updated. Tamara looked in my eyes, months ago, and assured me she was unafraid to walk the walk ahead of her. I’m so very proud of her and Chris.

I look forward to your documentary and plan to make a contribution to your fundraiser.

Thanks for all your work,

JB

Expand full comment

Thanks Trish for the eye witness accounts of this farcical trial. This Canadian fears that under the ruling thumb of the village idiot we call PM, common sense might lose. TL deserves some kind of 🇨🇦 humanitarian medal for what she has endured under this corrupt dictatorship. I’ve lost so much optimism in the return to the nation I once loved. Prayers to Tamara and her law team.

Expand full comment

Cheers to the Kiwi who's voice message you played at the beginning. His message was concise, thorough, and elegantly put. Bravo sir.

Expand full comment

Again, Thank you Trish. Stay vigilant; as if we need to remind you. Grateful to you. We remain Critical

Expand full comment

I look forward to your coverage and am grateful that you're choosing to do this. Your podcast once again did not disappoint! ❤️

Expand full comment

I just want to say I really appreciate your coverage, Trish! You must be exhausted...

Expand full comment

Oh, did we just experience it differently Mr Prime Minister?

Expand full comment

Pussy Trudeau doesn't understand English so he must be given a little slack for Lying about MANDATED, DEADLY, COMPULSORY INJECTIONS he likes to call 'VACCINE'.

Here we go again! The NEXT FALSE Man-enhanced Viral EPIDEMIC - COVID Mk 2. Not a chance!

Fool you once = Shame on you! Fool you twice Shame on them!

Leave our kids alone, or you'll find trouble you never dreamed of!

This sinister tactic is what Big Pharma, The FDA & CDC used to CHEAT an unwarranted 'EUA' (Emergency Use authorisation) Licence to distribute and apply DEADLY, unproven, untested, injections they referred to as "VACCINES".

IVERMECTIN, Hydroxichloroquine, etc,. Despite decades of SAFE HUMAN use, they colluded to pretend that these 'Anti-Virals' were now NOT SUITABLE for humans, but formulated for animals! (As is ASPIRIN also used on animals). IVERMECTIN and Hydroxychloroquine, etc, have been used SAFELY & EFFECTIVELY for decades, with WHO LICENCED recommendation and Approval, as well as a Nobel Prize for Medicine.

The main condition required that 'NO PRE-EXISTING, ANTI-VIRAL, PROVEN SAFE, MEDICINES like IVERMECTIN, Hydroxychloroquine, etc, EXISTED'.

I'm 78 and following a mini-stroke a few years back, had to visit my doctor this week for a blood pressure Test and told the nurse that I'd lost trust in the medical industry since Doctors had, since the Covid SCAMDEMIC, failed to meet the promises made in their Hippocratic Oath = "First DO NO HARM"! I told her I'd declined a Blood Test because it required a medic to insert a needle into my body. I was OK with this procedure until I found out how desperate the medical profession is to (jab) GENETICALLY MODIFY every last one of us with DEADLY mRNA INJECTIONS they call VACCINES!

My reason being - NO INFORMED CONSENT of potential injuries and DEATHS occurring POST VAX! Also, there's NO LIABILITY for the makers of these highly profitable, but deadly injections.

Big Pharma's Slogan; There's no PROFIT in HEALTHY HUMANS - So let's make them sick to create a market for our expensive useless but potentially deadly medicines"!

Several graphs are available comparing the staggering (Peer-reviewed) damage ratios of those injected children & babies compared to those left UNJABBED with Natural Immunity still intact!! But still Big Pharma make obscene profits from deadly or debilitating regressive 'medicines' that are simply created for PROFIT and probably DE-POPULATION! All without LIABILITY or any form of responsibility borne by the SUPER WEALTHY MURDERING MANUFACTURERS like Pfizer, et al,.

Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!

Expand full comment

Is it possible the judge and the crown know this is a bogus trial on bogus charges in a kangaroo court, but they have to play the game? What if this is being done in public as part of ‘disclosure’ of our corrupt govt and uber corrupt justice dept?

Expand full comment

All part of the pantomime.

Expand full comment

I’m thinking so toop

Expand full comment

Pussy Trudeau owns the Canadian judiciary!

Expand full comment

This political kabuki theatre "trial?" will likely be the most expensive persecution of what could have been and should have been dealt with by "summary conviction" rather than the high priced route in the history of the country. If you don't do "full disclosure" in a timely manner than you are by definition withholding evidence from the defense. It's not uncommon for full time police officers to be assigned to the defense to do just that in major cases which this is one. The same happened on the January 6 persecution of thousands. A bunch of white supremacist gun nuts who forgot their guns. Another agent provocateur set up like the kidnapping of the governor of Michigan and hundreds of innocent Muslims after 9/11. Good for the security states budgets as this tempest in a teapot will be. Calling defacto martial law on a bunch of peaceful workers is or should be a breathtaking example of overkill by arguably the most incompetent government in the history of the country and we've had more than our share of misgoverments. Only a Joseph Goebbels level of indoctrination industrial complexes could brainwash such a large section of the population so well. As the say in the USA.."the reason you have two partys is that one can't fool ALL the people ALL the time." The judge had to do a "time out ", really. Does she believe that she's in a university classroom? Again, you have my sympathies.

Expand full comment

Thanks Trish for the reporting and update. I have been following the actions of the crown prosecutors for some time and it brings to question their integrity and ability to do their jobs with distinction. It makes them look guilty of undermining the law. They did this through out the Emergency Act Commission as well, as that made it difficult for the lawyers for the Convoy to catch everything in order to ask the witness the right questions. Even our Supreme Court is justifyably untrustworthy just for Justice Wagner speaking out on a case they had yet to hear, was proof enough. Then the treatment of Justice Brown during the inquiry into his trip to Arizona, by Justice Wagner, was questionalble as Brown should have still been able to sit on the bench for the cases he had been assigned to. Taking leave should have been Brown's decision, not Wagner's. So I have read. Then the Coutts Four case with the dumping of documents, to which has brought them a winfall and the removal of the Crown Prosecutor, I hope this gets looked into in a short time frame. Again the justice system proves its failure as it appears the judge must go on vacation before he will engage in looking into the evidence provided by the defence. I have zero faith in the justice system of today and the deviants with in it.

I believe the Judge in Tamara and Chris's case should have disqualified the material put forward so late by the prosecution as it would ensure they would not try the same stunt again. It is for this reason I am worried for both Tamara and Chris, as well as the Coutts four. There truly is something rotten in the state of the Federal Justice System. Rotten to the core. Even paying to be appointed.

Expand full comment

Regarding the trial, the actions of the Crown are confusing. At that level, I can’t imagine incompetence, so maybe they are intentional. Maybe they already see they don’t have a strong case. If they lose, it means JT loses and, well, he will won't like that. And how will this impact votes in the next election? And how will this impact his brand on the world stage? Maybe the crown is paving the road for a mistrial to avoid embarrassment and fallout.

On the other hand, if the crown wins, JT wins. He gets his “justice was served" moment, but there could be backlash. Our constitutional right to legally protest will be shaken. Love the truckers or not, this should worry every single one of us. If the crown wins, I'm also concerned there will be a public reaction of some varying degree. The love for Tamara, coupled with the injustice of being charged, might be too much to bear.

A mistrial would avoid both evils.

Expand full comment

A shitty trial may give grounds for an appeal (higher court, larger audience, closer to next election). This smells like political theatre.

Expand full comment

So many corrupt agendas. Makes my head spin.

Expand full comment

Many thanks Trish, for your discernment, and for having done your due diligence from the jump.

Were it not for men and women of curiousity, courage, conscience and conviction, like you and Tom, for instance, (so many people I could name) folks like me would have very little ammo with which to contest all the libelous and slanderous statements made by our Supreme Leader and his squeaky little side-kick.

Promoted, ad naseum, by their MSM presstitues.

"Paid in Full."

One of these days, that formerly very young girl may have the courage to come out.

Or perhaps her father will. Or her mother. Or her uncle...

SOMEONE may eventually have the courage, conscience and conviction to spill the beans. (Perhaps they witnessed what happened to Larry Sinclair when he tried, and failed.)

It would be too little, too late anyway.

The needle and the damage done.

Expand full comment

Thanks again, Trish. My husband laughed at me being so excited that the latest update landed in my inbox! It's wonderful to see the GSG donations creeping up: https://www.givesendgo.com/GB14C

I fully support the documentary as I see it has great potential to not only be a time stamp of this period in history, but also a tool to perhaps help inform the MSM captured.

Expand full comment