Looks like Dr Meat (Carney) signed away the last shreds of Canadian sovereignty to his friend Ghebrayesus (Hebrew Jesus - I kid you not) at a sinister globalist NGO store-front op.
Very interesting for me. In 1986 , my Canadian fiancée ( later my husband) turned the on TV to show me the wonderful CBC news which he took national pride in. It was admittedly a high caliber, straight-shooting presentation which was head and shoulders above the typical US network news I was familiar with.
Glad to see and hear some of those presenters such as yourself are still giving to the public.
I have mixed feelings about Carney’s portfolio and his ethical responsibility to Canadians.
Here’s why.
1. Every Canadian is invested in stocks and bonds through the CPP, public sector unions’ pension plans, private pension savings and investments, corporate pension schemes, RRSP, RRIF and other vehicles. If those investments rise, everyone benefits. How do you, or anyone else, know for certain that Carney is making decisions solely to benefit himself and his cronies? That’s an assumption that can’t be proven and, as much as I don’t trust Carney, I can’t accuse him of an ethical bias if I can’t prove it.
2. The bias expressed by you, Trish, against wealthy men comes across as misplaced and naive envy. It shows that you have no understanding of what it takes for people in the private sector to become successful. Out of every dollar that a wealthy man has earned, can you prove what proportion was earned unethically? 5% ? 45%? 95% ? I could easily make the same claim about a union executive, or the head of a government agency, or an NGO that takes subsidies from Canadian taxpayers when they struggle to pay for groceries.
3. As a Libertarian, I believe that the #1 problem in Canada is too much government. The larger it becomes, the more it strangles the freedoms and sources of prosperity for everyone who does not directly benefit from its gravy train. If Carney presided over a government with one tenth of its current size, cost and scopes of authority, few people would be concerned about his investment portfolio. You would not even be reporting on this topic. This means that the Canadian public is victim of its own preferences- the majority of voters have chosen Carney and built the Oligopoly of Political Power that we have today over generations. Let’s all look in the mirror and realize that none of us is the “fairest in the land” where political ethics are concerned.
To your point 2: One person's "naive envy" is what the human race used to call ethics and fairness. Wealthy men, in a healthy society, not your Ayn Randish dystopia, are knee-capped men. Oh, and women! Especially women who currently, in defiance of First Wave Feminism, are trying very hard to fry the world, rather than save it.
No bias that I am aware of. Although I have less and less tolerance for the 1% who rape the marketplace through cheating, stock markets swindles and private equity scams. That is not capitalism. It is sculduggery. Like the 2008 credit default swap nightmare and now the condo crisis in Toronto. Those who caused the problem rarely pay. We always do. I believe in small business and big business when it behaves itself.
My point about bias is this: Not everyone who has been successfully in business is a crook, or immoral, or someone who warrants being lumped into the few who deserves negative comments. When references are made in a ‘collective’ sense to demean a class of people like “the wealthy” or “the billionaires”, it is received by listeners like me as a slap in the face that many in that class do not deserve. Capitalism may have its faults in the wrong hands, but it has been (likely) the greatest boon to humanity ever in terms of its benefits.
Religion has (likely) been the root cause for widespread division between people, wars, death & destruction, propaganda, and more - yet the most pious believers are often admired as individuals, and given a pass for all of the sins of the past attributed to their religions. Why do they get a pass when the people who represent the best of capitalism get thrown under the bus of “greedy capitalists” collectivism.
Trish. You claim to be politically homeless. You’ve described yourself as a “Woody Guthrie” libertarian and a fan girl of Jack Layton who was the champion of the “working class”. Properly understood in economics, both capital (machines, buildings, money, etc) and labour ( front line workers, middle managers and the executives) combine to produce the products and services to meet market demands in which price, quality, and availability all contribute to voluntary consumer choices to buy, or not to buy. Neither Woody Guthrie now Jack Layton ever worked as executives in for-profit companies and, as such, possessed no “lived experience” in those jobs. Before retirement, I worked 41 years in the private sector culminating in my final years and a Director, Talent Supply Chain for an international consulting firm, a business owner and a board member who participated in the big decisions required to compete successfully in our markets. Never in those years did I ever need to compromise my libertarian principles. Meanwhile, governments constantly imposed edicts on us to restrict our choices to serve their political agendas or special interest lobby groups like the CCCT (Climate Change Crisis Theory) NGO and globalist entities ( the UN, IPCC, ICLEI).
When you demean wealthy people, I take it personally. If you wish to demean capitalists, I hope you explain that men like me had nothing to do with the 2008-9 Wall Street heist and that none of that economic crime against average citizens would have been possible if government actually “served and protected” average citizens. The failure of the “political and regulatory classes” is really the root cause of the majority of today’s problems. The #1 problem in Canada today is TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT and the face of that problem is Mark Carney.
I imagine that in the light of the now-exposed Epstein/Jewish State conspiracy to steal and money launder everything from children to international bank holdings, you would want to moderate your statement?
As for your career CV: do you think there is enough time left to atone for it?
Atone for what? I have nothing to atone for relating to the “sins” of strangers who I have never met. Your notions of collective existential guilt is so foreign to me that I wonder how anyone who claims to be a fan of democracy has ever truly examined there presuppositions.
I have never claimed to be a fan of democracy. As for any faith the West had in outlawing the premise of “collective existential guilt” (criminalized at Nuremberg), it died amidst the rubble and unburied corpses of the Palestinian Semites of Gaza.
Why are you living in Canada if your passion is elsewhere and democracy is of little interest to you? It’s a legitimate question based on the exchanges you and I have had. Are you a Canadian citizen, or a landed immigration with a time-limited visa granted by our Liberal-friendly Immigration authorities? Readers of this post don’t even know your real name let along your status here in Canada❗️
Your argument parses as rather specious. Trish wood doesn't appear to me to have a bias against wealthy men. She is addressing the prohibition detailed in the Members’ Integrity Act. The Members’ Integrity Act prohibits a member of Executive Council (Cabinet Ministers, Ministers or Members of Cabinet) — which surely includes the Prime Minister —from holding or trading in securities, stocks, futures or commodities.
While holding these positions, they must either divest these assets or place them in a blind trust.
These prohibitions apply generally. Your post suggests in essence that rules do not count for Mark Carney. The rules exist a priori in general not in a particular case hic et nunc as though to say “well, it depends.”
No, it does not depend! All ministers are expected to treat the prohibitions as given. I repeat all ministers. Mark Carney is not a special case. No one knows for “certain” that Mark Carney may or may not make decisions solely to benefit himself. That is why there are rules.
Indeed that is why there are rules, courts and court cases. When it is proved in a court of law that a particular businessman has derived a portion of his income, no matter the percentage “unethically”, he can be fined or jailed.
Mark Carney is Prime Minister because the Liberal Party is “unethical” and corrupt.
In essence, your claim is that ethical violations are so common among the electorate — which I suppose includes you — that there ought to be no rules at all.
It is widely accepted that it is government that should be making the rules rather than that the government should be above the rules. Posts such as yours tend to encourage unethical behaviour while justifying it, because ““none of us is the “fairest in the land.””
Your post is larded with contradictions. No wonder so much unethical behaviour goes unchallenged. In fact your post is larded with unreflective emotional appeal. Before posting you ought to read the Constitution especially where it concerns responsibilities.
Canada’s Constitution outlines the responsibilities of different levels of government and the roles of various institutions. The Constitution establishes the framework for Canada’s system of government, including the division of powers between federal and provincial/territorial governments. The Constitution also defines the roles of the Monarch, Governor General, Senate, and House of Commons, as well as the responsibilities of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
The concept of “responsible government” emphasizes the accountability of ministers to Parliament for their actions and the actions of their departments.
True, this space encourages opinion — indeed that is a good thing. Opinion is often misinformed as to what is the role of government, its branches, its ministers. And few people are familiar enough with the Constitution to understand it or interpret it as it is written. Incidentally Canada is not a confederation — it is a federation.
It is not a republic. There are important distinctions. Understanding the distinctions as the apply in Canada among its Citizens would make critiquing those who would avoid the distinctions and their behaviours transparent.
Tragically the people who do not like the implications of its citizens being informed, disarm them by calculatingly failing to inform them. Thus commentators often fall back on ‘should’ and ‘should not’ — emotionally larded comments included.
The Constitution was, and still is, durable — a source of reference overlooked by those who befit or who would benefit by overlooking it — no question, but as well it would benefit those who would critique those who overlook it. Canadian citizens are easily bamboozled because civics are intentionally not taught in school.
Which leaves its interpretation open to lawyerly malfeasance!
I was, however, referring to many times in past podcasts when Trish made comments that disparaged wealthy people in a way that suggested that all wealthy people had acquired their money in ways that were less than ethical. It’s a “collective” pejorative expression popular among many of our citizens, especially on the political left and those employed in public sector jobs in which membership in a public sector labour union is a non-negotiable condition of employment. NDP voters and labour unions are known to promote their versions of “social justice” (eg DEI),”victimization’ and quasi-Marxist ideology. The non-stop growth of governments has been the consequence of their activism and lobbying.
We live in an age when ~ 55% of the earnings of average Canadians goes to paying taxes and fees (licences, permits, certificates, etc) that feed all four levels of government. In 1961, the average Canadian remitted -38% of annual earnings to those public entities. Back then, Canadians could afford a home, raise a family of five children and save for retirement - all on one income while the mother could be at home to care for the family.
As governments grew, the cost of living grew in lockstep. Today, a two income family with an average of 1.4 children can barely survive without incurring record levels of debt and no (or scanty) retirement savings.
The cost of government operations is much higher than any comparable operation in the competitive, “for profit”, highly regulated corporate sector. If you spent time on a corporate board, especially during the Covid years, this would be self-evident to you.
In Ontario alone, there are over 400,000 provincial regulations in force that control virtually every choice a citizen or business owner makes. Our problems are not owing to capitalism so much as the forces of Crony Capitalism, Crony Statism and Crony Socialism. In other words, the sources of our current problems accelerated when Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) became in vogue within our western economies. It was kicked-stated early in the last century when Britain and America created central banking institutions to introduce fiat money to the world - money backed by nothing more than the ability to tax the nation’s citizens. Read the ‘Creature from Jekyll Island’ to get an historical account of how this unfolded. It’s a great read and one that will give you a perspective on the local and economy that, once seen, is impossible to forget.
At some point we should return to the notion that being a "leader" is about public service and maybe even taking a financial hit to do good.n Quaint idea but it weeds out the scoundrels.
I concur that your content in the meltdowns and podcast is always top notch! I also enjoy reading the comments; you really get people talking. I noticed the floral top immediately; beautiful choice!! Your haircut is lovely too. I'm looking forward to more of you on YouTube and for the Convoy documentary.
"And yet here we are." Exactly. And what will Marx Carnage's base decide? How many Canadians will care not a whit and vote Liberal anyway? Gotta tell ya, I really shudder when I contemplate this.
Carney's chief-of-staff is administering the conflict of interest screen? Are you effing kidding?
That in itself is a conflict of interest because the chief-of-staff is responsible to Carney himself. They are normalizing ethics violations to demoralize the people. Demoralized people tend to vote for incumbents to maintain the status quo. All part of the Liberals forever plan.
A very good show, Trish. Thanks for your "low key" presentation of some of the details of how CBC made your life miserable back in the day. CBC has fallen far from its glory days of As It Happens and the Journal. Best Regards.
It nearly killed me. There I said it but I know the people here will understand that. Sadly the person responsible is one of their most cherished journos -- now retired.
Tass, Pravda, RT and Press News as well as Shin Wa may be state-assisted, funded and supported but not ruthlessly state-controlled like the CBC and ALL Western Mass Media. Sometimes the State control is hidden or diluted by Corporate control but we know that the two of them are fucking in the control booth. That is the coarse definition of Fascism.
This does not have anything to do about anyones posts, good bad or indifferent, this has been fomenting in me for a long time, just going to put it out there thru your substack.
When it comes down to how the world really works, it is far different than substack and the meme developers.
Using common sense as your gyroscope, humanity should be concentrating on what the real problem is.
The real problem is the BIS aka Bank of International Settlements, Davos, Switzerland, and every other bullshit 3 letter acronym IMF, WHO, USA, NATO, World Bank, the BIS is the owner operator of the world central banking system, aThe Federal Reserve Bank of America, humanity is slaves to.
Forget the National Enquirer shit, you see on Substack, day in day out, it is brain fluff for the masses.
The best three books humanity should read is, the Protocals of the Elders of Zion, Tower of Basel and Beyond Banksters, it is a good starting point.
Humanity needs to fight the Beast where it lives, get rid of their central banking system and control.
Every Nation in the World should be a Sovereign Nation issuing their own debt free, interest free currency.
The BIS Cha(bad) Jews are trying to destroy humanity for their evil self servicing purposes aka a NWO, God’s unchosen people, that is why he sent his only son to fight the evil Jews.
It's my understanding that the Protocols were an invention of the Russian Czarist secret service created in the years before World War 1. ie --- they're FAKE.
The second trial proved The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be not fake. But even if they were fake, they are clearly so prescient that they may as way be real. Have you not been following the Epstein/Jewish State Pedophile Sex Slavery and Global Blackmail Conspiracy revelations? The thing that is unravelling before our very eyes.
Trish, I am really enjoying the mid and monday meltdowns. You are providing such great content. I also appreciate that you still talk about COVID. I hope Rodney and the lady from Winnipeg contact that lawyer as well.
How do Canadians like oligarch rule by Palace and City of London appointees so far?
By the way — the Trump administration just rejected the WHOs claimed jurisdiction over U.S. citizens. See Dr Malone.
Can we expect Mark Carney’s Liberals to follow the U.S. lead and similarly reject the WHOs impositions? I wonder!
Looks like Dr Meat (Carney) signed away the last shreds of Canadian sovereignty to his friend Ghebrayesus (Hebrew Jesus - I kid you not) at a sinister globalist NGO store-front op.
You look very pretty. The haircut works! :-)
Love your show Trish. ❤️ thanks for all you do!
Very interesting for me. In 1986 , my Canadian fiancée ( later my husband) turned the on TV to show me the wonderful CBC news which he took national pride in. It was admittedly a high caliber, straight-shooting presentation which was head and shoulders above the typical US network news I was familiar with.
Glad to see and hear some of those presenters such as yourself are still giving to the public.
Meant to add that it is so sad that it followed US news down the tubes.
I have mixed feelings about Carney’s portfolio and his ethical responsibility to Canadians.
Here’s why.
1. Every Canadian is invested in stocks and bonds through the CPP, public sector unions’ pension plans, private pension savings and investments, corporate pension schemes, RRSP, RRIF and other vehicles. If those investments rise, everyone benefits. How do you, or anyone else, know for certain that Carney is making decisions solely to benefit himself and his cronies? That’s an assumption that can’t be proven and, as much as I don’t trust Carney, I can’t accuse him of an ethical bias if I can’t prove it.
2. The bias expressed by you, Trish, against wealthy men comes across as misplaced and naive envy. It shows that you have no understanding of what it takes for people in the private sector to become successful. Out of every dollar that a wealthy man has earned, can you prove what proportion was earned unethically? 5% ? 45%? 95% ? I could easily make the same claim about a union executive, or the head of a government agency, or an NGO that takes subsidies from Canadian taxpayers when they struggle to pay for groceries.
3. As a Libertarian, I believe that the #1 problem in Canada is too much government. The larger it becomes, the more it strangles the freedoms and sources of prosperity for everyone who does not directly benefit from its gravy train. If Carney presided over a government with one tenth of its current size, cost and scopes of authority, few people would be concerned about his investment portfolio. You would not even be reporting on this topic. This means that the Canadian public is victim of its own preferences- the majority of voters have chosen Carney and built the Oligopoly of Political Power that we have today over generations. Let’s all look in the mirror and realize that none of us is the “fairest in the land” where political ethics are concerned.
To your point 2: One person's "naive envy" is what the human race used to call ethics and fairness. Wealthy men, in a healthy society, not your Ayn Randish dystopia, are knee-capped men. Oh, and women! Especially women who currently, in defiance of First Wave Feminism, are trying very hard to fry the world, rather than save it.
Explain how wealthy men as “knee-capped” men. It’s unclear to me what you mean by this and its implications
No.
No bias that I am aware of. Although I have less and less tolerance for the 1% who rape the marketplace through cheating, stock markets swindles and private equity scams. That is not capitalism. It is sculduggery. Like the 2008 credit default swap nightmare and now the condo crisis in Toronto. Those who caused the problem rarely pay. We always do. I believe in small business and big business when it behaves itself.
My point about bias is this: Not everyone who has been successfully in business is a crook, or immoral, or someone who warrants being lumped into the few who deserves negative comments. When references are made in a ‘collective’ sense to demean a class of people like “the wealthy” or “the billionaires”, it is received by listeners like me as a slap in the face that many in that class do not deserve. Capitalism may have its faults in the wrong hands, but it has been (likely) the greatest boon to humanity ever in terms of its benefits.
Religion has (likely) been the root cause for widespread division between people, wars, death & destruction, propaganda, and more - yet the most pious believers are often admired as individuals, and given a pass for all of the sins of the past attributed to their religions. Why do they get a pass when the people who represent the best of capitalism get thrown under the bus of “greedy capitalists” collectivism.
Trish. You claim to be politically homeless. You’ve described yourself as a “Woody Guthrie” libertarian and a fan girl of Jack Layton who was the champion of the “working class”. Properly understood in economics, both capital (machines, buildings, money, etc) and labour ( front line workers, middle managers and the executives) combine to produce the products and services to meet market demands in which price, quality, and availability all contribute to voluntary consumer choices to buy, or not to buy. Neither Woody Guthrie now Jack Layton ever worked as executives in for-profit companies and, as such, possessed no “lived experience” in those jobs. Before retirement, I worked 41 years in the private sector culminating in my final years and a Director, Talent Supply Chain for an international consulting firm, a business owner and a board member who participated in the big decisions required to compete successfully in our markets. Never in those years did I ever need to compromise my libertarian principles. Meanwhile, governments constantly imposed edicts on us to restrict our choices to serve their political agendas or special interest lobby groups like the CCCT (Climate Change Crisis Theory) NGO and globalist entities ( the UN, IPCC, ICLEI).
When you demean wealthy people, I take it personally. If you wish to demean capitalists, I hope you explain that men like me had nothing to do with the 2008-9 Wall Street heist and that none of that economic crime against average citizens would have been possible if government actually “served and protected” average citizens. The failure of the “political and regulatory classes” is really the root cause of the majority of today’s problems. The #1 problem in Canada today is TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT and the face of that problem is Mark Carney.
I imagine that in the light of the now-exposed Epstein/Jewish State conspiracy to steal and money launder everything from children to international bank holdings, you would want to moderate your statement?
As for your career CV: do you think there is enough time left to atone for it?
Atone for what? I have nothing to atone for relating to the “sins” of strangers who I have never met. Your notions of collective existential guilt is so foreign to me that I wonder how anyone who claims to be a fan of democracy has ever truly examined there presuppositions.
I have never claimed to be a fan of democracy. As for any faith the West had in outlawing the premise of “collective existential guilt” (criminalized at Nuremberg), it died amidst the rubble and unburied corpses of the Palestinian Semites of Gaza.
Why are you living in Canada if your passion is elsewhere and democracy is of little interest to you? It’s a legitimate question based on the exchanges you and I have had. Are you a Canadian citizen, or a landed immigration with a time-limited visa granted by our Liberal-friendly Immigration authorities? Readers of this post don’t even know your real name let along your status here in Canada❗️
Your argument parses as rather specious. Trish wood doesn't appear to me to have a bias against wealthy men. She is addressing the prohibition detailed in the Members’ Integrity Act. The Members’ Integrity Act prohibits a member of Executive Council (Cabinet Ministers, Ministers or Members of Cabinet) — which surely includes the Prime Minister —from holding or trading in securities, stocks, futures or commodities.
While holding these positions, they must either divest these assets or place them in a blind trust.
These prohibitions apply generally. Your post suggests in essence that rules do not count for Mark Carney. The rules exist a priori in general not in a particular case hic et nunc as though to say “well, it depends.”
No, it does not depend! All ministers are expected to treat the prohibitions as given. I repeat all ministers. Mark Carney is not a special case. No one knows for “certain” that Mark Carney may or may not make decisions solely to benefit himself. That is why there are rules.
Indeed that is why there are rules, courts and court cases. When it is proved in a court of law that a particular businessman has derived a portion of his income, no matter the percentage “unethically”, he can be fined or jailed.
Mark Carney is Prime Minister because the Liberal Party is “unethical” and corrupt.
In essence, your claim is that ethical violations are so common among the electorate — which I suppose includes you — that there ought to be no rules at all.
It is widely accepted that it is government that should be making the rules rather than that the government should be above the rules. Posts such as yours tend to encourage unethical behaviour while justifying it, because ““none of us is the “fairest in the land.””
Your post is larded with contradictions. No wonder so much unethical behaviour goes unchallenged. In fact your post is larded with unreflective emotional appeal. Before posting you ought to read the Constitution especially where it concerns responsibilities.
Canada’s Constitution outlines the responsibilities of different levels of government and the roles of various institutions. The Constitution establishes the framework for Canada’s system of government, including the division of powers between federal and provincial/territorial governments. The Constitution also defines the roles of the Monarch, Governor General, Senate, and House of Commons, as well as the responsibilities of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
The concept of “responsible government” emphasizes the accountability of ministers to Parliament for their actions and the actions of their departments.
True, this space encourages opinion — indeed that is a good thing. Opinion is often misinformed as to what is the role of government, its branches, its ministers. And few people are familiar enough with the Constitution to understand it or interpret it as it is written. Incidentally Canada is not a confederation — it is a federation.
It is not a republic. There are important distinctions. Understanding the distinctions as the apply in Canada among its Citizens would make critiquing those who would avoid the distinctions and their behaviours transparent.
Tragically the people who do not like the implications of its citizens being informed, disarm them by calculatingly failing to inform them. Thus commentators often fall back on ‘should’ and ‘should not’ — emotionally larded comments included.
The Constitution was, and still is, durable — a source of reference overlooked by those who befit or who would benefit by overlooking it — no question, but as well it would benefit those who would critique those who overlook it. Canadian citizens are easily bamboozled because civics are intentionally not taught in school.
Which leaves its interpretation open to lawyerly malfeasance!
I appreciate your comments.
I was, however, referring to many times in past podcasts when Trish made comments that disparaged wealthy people in a way that suggested that all wealthy people had acquired their money in ways that were less than ethical. It’s a “collective” pejorative expression popular among many of our citizens, especially on the political left and those employed in public sector jobs in which membership in a public sector labour union is a non-negotiable condition of employment. NDP voters and labour unions are known to promote their versions of “social justice” (eg DEI),”victimization’ and quasi-Marxist ideology. The non-stop growth of governments has been the consequence of their activism and lobbying.
We live in an age when ~ 55% of the earnings of average Canadians goes to paying taxes and fees (licences, permits, certificates, etc) that feed all four levels of government. In 1961, the average Canadian remitted -38% of annual earnings to those public entities. Back then, Canadians could afford a home, raise a family of five children and save for retirement - all on one income while the mother could be at home to care for the family.
As governments grew, the cost of living grew in lockstep. Today, a two income family with an average of 1.4 children can barely survive without incurring record levels of debt and no (or scanty) retirement savings.
The cost of government operations is much higher than any comparable operation in the competitive, “for profit”, highly regulated corporate sector. If you spent time on a corporate board, especially during the Covid years, this would be self-evident to you.
In Ontario alone, there are over 400,000 provincial regulations in force that control virtually every choice a citizen or business owner makes. Our problems are not owing to capitalism so much as the forces of Crony Capitalism, Crony Statism and Crony Socialism. In other words, the sources of our current problems accelerated when Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) became in vogue within our western economies. It was kicked-stated early in the last century when Britain and America created central banking institutions to introduce fiat money to the world - money backed by nothing more than the ability to tax the nation’s citizens. Read the ‘Creature from Jekyll Island’ to get an historical account of how this unfolded. It’s a great read and one that will give you a perspective on the local and economy that, once seen, is impossible to forget.
At some point we should return to the notion that being a "leader" is about public service and maybe even taking a financial hit to do good.n Quaint idea but it weeds out the scoundrels.
The hair looks great Trish!
I concur that your content in the meltdowns and podcast is always top notch! I also enjoy reading the comments; you really get people talking. I noticed the floral top immediately; beautiful choice!! Your haircut is lovely too. I'm looking forward to more of you on YouTube and for the Convoy documentary.
"And yet here we are." Exactly. And what will Marx Carnage's base decide? How many Canadians will care not a whit and vote Liberal anyway? Gotta tell ya, I really shudder when I contemplate this.
Carney's chief-of-staff is administering the conflict of interest screen? Are you effing kidding?
That in itself is a conflict of interest because the chief-of-staff is responsible to Carney himself. They are normalizing ethics violations to demoralize the people. Demoralized people tend to vote for incumbents to maintain the status quo. All part of the Liberals forever plan.
Bwahaha! Ya laugh or ya cry.
"Mark, bubbe, I'm your White Knight"
https://youtu.be/Q1jPTY9uxc8?si=_RN0504JhN1YjBLA
A very good show, Trish. Thanks for your "low key" presentation of some of the details of how CBC made your life miserable back in the day. CBC has fallen far from its glory days of As It Happens and the Journal. Best Regards.
Wanna know every last CBC dirty detail, Trish. Bring it on. Time for the truth volcano to blow baby, blow.
It nearly killed me. There I said it but I know the people here will understand that. Sadly the person responsible is one of their most cherished journos -- now retired.
And now you are the stronger for it. How about telling the whole story - no holds barred - right here on your substack...
The CBC and the Liberal Party of Canada should NEVER be in charge to investigate themselves!!
Unbiased Chartered Accounting firm performing forensic audits!!
The CBC should end and leave no trace, except perhaps in some government archive for historical purposes.
Tass, Pravda, RT and Press News as well as Shin Wa may be state-assisted, funded and supported but not ruthlessly state-controlled like the CBC and ALL Western Mass Media. Sometimes the State control is hidden or diluted by Corporate control but we know that the two of them are fucking in the control booth. That is the coarse definition of Fascism.
Hey Trish
This does not have anything to do about anyones posts, good bad or indifferent, this has been fomenting in me for a long time, just going to put it out there thru your substack.
When it comes down to how the world really works, it is far different than substack and the meme developers.
Using common sense as your gyroscope, humanity should be concentrating on what the real problem is.
The real problem is the BIS aka Bank of International Settlements, Davos, Switzerland, and every other bullshit 3 letter acronym IMF, WHO, USA, NATO, World Bank, the BIS is the owner operator of the world central banking system, aThe Federal Reserve Bank of America, humanity is slaves to.
Forget the National Enquirer shit, you see on Substack, day in day out, it is brain fluff for the masses.
The best three books humanity should read is, the Protocals of the Elders of Zion, Tower of Basel and Beyond Banksters, it is a good starting point.
Humanity needs to fight the Beast where it lives, get rid of their central banking system and control.
Every Nation in the World should be a Sovereign Nation issuing their own debt free, interest free currency.
The BIS Cha(bad) Jews are trying to destroy humanity for their evil self servicing purposes aka a NWO, God’s unchosen people, that is why he sent his only son to fight the evil Jews.
It's my understanding that the Protocols were an invention of the Russian Czarist secret service created in the years before World War 1. ie --- they're FAKE.
The second trial proved The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be not fake. But even if they were fake, they are clearly so prescient that they may as way be real. Have you not been following the Epstein/Jewish State Pedophile Sex Slavery and Global Blackmail Conspiracy revelations? The thing that is unravelling before our very eyes.
If the glasses fit, look at what is going on around you, fake or not, it is happening.
Hey! I thought you just agreed that the Protocols were FAKE.
I did not agree to anything, I just repected your opinion.
I did not agree to anything, just respected your opinion.
Trish, I am really enjoying the mid and monday meltdowns. You are providing such great content. I also appreciate that you still talk about COVID. I hope Rodney and the lady from Winnipeg contact that lawyer as well.
Marianne. I find out. She's the greatest. And of course I love Rodney.
Luv the look Trish, beautiful in floral top and the picture in background is so pretty. Look forward to your podcasts always. Keep on reporting!
I can think of nothing Trish could do to look un-absolutely lovely.
I do love black but I thought I'd switch it up:)